It's been a while since my last post. Partly because my trial version of SPSS ran out, partly because I've been busy with other stuff, but most importantly because this is my blog and I can update it whenever I want!
I'll follow up the discussion from this thread. The question asked:
Does the 6.2 rating of a bad jumping DC (good otherwise) or the 7.2 rating of a good jumping DC (bad otherwise) have the equivelant effect on the final result?
Can a team with the 6.2 DC win more games than the team with the 7.2 DC?
Well. To find the result, I simply removed average rating from the equation.
I did a regression analysis on team goals conceded per game for DCs to find the most important attributes for not conceding goals. I've OCRd 1196 DCs from Voller, so the numbers should be significant enough to provide quite a clear result.
And the result?
*drumroll*
*more drums*
*drumrollllllll*
Get a DC that can jump! ;)
Hill Climb 2
-
Have been messing about on Hill Climb 2 recently which is very addictive,
and uploading this in order to link to Reddit.
5 years ago
No comments:
Post a Comment